Actualización sobre las contraindicaciones en cirugía refractiva láser corneal / Update on contraindications in laser corneal refractive surgery

Los más de 25 años de experiencia con las técnicas de cirugía refractiva (desde que se aprobara por la Food and Drug Administration [FDA] de EE. UU. el uso del láser excímer en el remodelamiento de la córnea en 1995), sumado a los avances tecnológicos en oftalmología (láser de femtosegundo, ablación guida por topografía, sistemas de imagen de segmento anterior) y el mayor entendimiento de los errores refractivos, las aberraciones de alto orden y la biomecánica corneal, hacen que la cirugía refractiva corneal con láser sea un método seguro y eficaz para la corrección de estos defectos. Sin embargo, a día de hoy, siguen existiendo ciertas circunstancias que suponen una contraindicación para su aplicación, además de otras que podrían asociarse a complicaciones, y que deben ser analizadas con detenimiento.Esta revisión repasa las contraindicaciones actuales para la cirugía refractiva corneal con láser recogidas en los Protocolos de Práctica Preferente (PPP) de la Academia Estadounidense de Oftalmología y de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. Estos protocolos están basados en la mayor evidencia científica disponible en la actualidad y permiten extraer recomendaciones claras, mejorando el perfil de seguridad de estas técnicas.Las contraindicaciones pueden diferenciarse en relativas o absolutas; entre estas últimas están: la edad inferior a 18 años, la ausencia de estabilidad refractiva y la existencia de ciertas afecciones oculares (entre las que destacan determinadas distrofias corneales, queratocono, ojo seco mal controlado) o sistémicas (procesos autoinmunes activos o diabetes mellitus mal controlada)...(AU)

More than 25 years of experience with refractive surgery techniques (since the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] of the United States approved the use of the excimer laser in the remodeling of the cornea in 1995), added to the technological advances in ophthalmology (femtosecond laser, topography-guided ablation, anterior segment imaging systems) and increased understanding of refractive errors, higher order aberrations, and corneal biomechanics make corneal laser refractive surgery a safe method and effective for the correction of these defects. However, to date, there are still certain circumstances that represent a contraindication for its application, in addition to others that could be associated with complications, and that must be carefully analyzed.This review analyzes the current contraindications for laser corneal refractive surgery listed in the Preferred Practice Protocols (PPPs) of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the Spanish Ophthalmology Society. These protocols are based on the best scientific evidence currently available and allow clear recommendations to be drawn, improving the safety profile of these techniques.Contraindications can be differentiated into relative or absolute; among the latter are: age less than 18 years, the absence of refractive stability and the existence of certain ocular pathologies (including certain corneal dystrophies, keratoconus, poorly controlled dry eye) or systemic pathologies (active autoimmune processes or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus). Other circumstances such as the use of certain drugs (amiodarone, isotretinoin), extreme values of mean central keratometry and pachymetry, history of previous uveitis or glaucoma, pregnancy and lactation, are considered relative contraindications according to the PPPs. However, there are studies that demonstrate the safety of refractive surgery in some of these cases. (AU)

Laser in situ keratomileusis and surface ablation in pregnancy.

PURPOSE: Although corneal refractive surgery is contraindicated during pregnancy, some patients are unaware that they are pregnant when they undergo surgery. Our objectives were to determine the functional outcomes of corneal refractive surgery during pregnancy and to compare the results with those of nonpregnant women. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, interventional case series review of patients who were pregnant and who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy, PRK) from September 11, 2002 to December 12, 2020 (group 1, n=82 eyes). Patients were included consecutively. Findings were compared with those of nonpregnant women (group 2, n=164 eyes). Functional (visual and refractive) outcomes are described. Follow-up was at least 550 days (control group, median [IQR], 990 days [715-1496]; study group, 895 days [709-1310]). The setting was Clínica Baviera, Spain, (AIER Eye Hospital Group). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of efficacy index (EI). No complications of pregnancy or labor were reported. Similarly, a search of medical records revealed no adverse effects in the infants. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series on pregnancy and refractive surgery. We do not recommend performing LASIK or surface ablation on pregnant women. Our objective in the present study was to present relevant scientific data obtained from women who underwent refractive surgery while unaware that they were pregnant.

Update on contraindications in laser corneal refractive surgery.

More than 25 years of experience with refractive surgery techniques (since the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] of the United States approved the use of the excimer laser in the remodeling of the cornea in 1995), added to the technological advances in ophthalmology (femtosecond laser, topography-guided ablation, anterior segment imaging systems) and increased understanding of refractive errors, higher order aberrations, and corneal biomechanics make corneal laser refractive surgery a safe method and effective for the correction of these defects. However, to date, there are still certain circumstances that represent a contraindication for its application, in addition to others that could be associated with complications, and that must be carefully analyzed. This review analyzes the current contraindications for laser corneal refractive surgery listed in the Preferred Practice Protocols (PPPs) of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the Spanish Ophthalmology Society. These protocols are based on the best scientific evidence currently available and allow clear recommendations to be drawn, improving the safety profile of these techniques. Contraindications can be differentiated into relative or absolute; among the latter are: age less than 18 years, the absence of refractive stability and the existence of certain ocular pathologies (including certain corneal dystrophies, keratoconus, poorly controlled dry eye) or systemic pathologies (active autoimmune processes or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus). Other circumstances such as the use of certain drugs (amiodarone, isotretinoin), extreme values of mean central keratometry and pachymetry, history of previous uveitis or glaucoma, pregnancy and lactation, are considered relative contraindications according to the PPPs. However, there are studies that demonstrate the safety of refractive surgery in some of these cases.

Corrección de la presbicia tras cirugía cristaliniana. ¿Dónde nos encontramos en 2020? / Lens-based surgical correction of presbyopia. Where are we in 2020?

INTRODUCCIÓN: La presbicia es la pérdida progresiva e irreversible de la acomodación debido al envejecimiento. Es una de las principales causas de disminución de la calidad de vida en personas a partir de los 45 años derivada de la, muchas veces novedosa, dependencia de las gafas. El afán por corregirla por parte de los oftalmólogos, impulsados por el deseo de millones de personas que la padecen, se ha convertido en uno de los principales motores de desarrollo de la tecnología de las lentes intraoculares (LIO) durante los últimos 20 años. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Esta revisión repasa las distintas alternativas que han permitido ir mejorando el enfoque quirúrgico cristaliniano de la presbicia; desde las lentes monofocales y la técnica de la monovisión, a las lentes acomodativas, pasando por las lentes multifocales refractivas y difractivas y terminando con las más recientes lentes de foco o campo extendido conocidas como EDOF. RESULTADOS: Cada una de estas LIO tiene sus ventajas, limitaciones e inconvenientes; y además, no existe la lente que se adapte a las necesidades de todos los pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario conocer la variedad de lentes disponibles, y comprender en profundidad tanto sus propiedades ópticas como el impacto que estas van a tener luego en su rendimiento clínico y en la calidad visual de los pacientes. Esto nos debería ayudar a poder seleccionar la mejor alternativa para cada uno de ellos

INTRODUCTION: Presbyopia is the progressive and irreversible loss of accommodation due to aging. It is one of the main causes of loss of quality of life in people from 45 years of age, due to the, often novel, dependence on spectacles. The eagerness to correct it by ophthalmologists impulsed by the desire of millions of people who suffer from it, has become one of the main drivers for the development of intraocular lens (IOL) technology over the last twenty years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review briefly presents the different alternatives that have allowed us to improve the crystalline lens surgical approach of presbyopia; from monofocal lenses and monovision technique, accommodative, refractive, and diffractive multifocal lenses, and finally the most recent extended depth of focus/field lenses known as EDOFs. RESULTS: Each IOL has its advantages, limitations and disadvantages. Furthermore, there is no single lens that suits the needs of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to know the variety of lenses available, and to have an in-depth understanding of their optical properties, as well as the impact that these will have later on their clinical performance and on the visual quality of the patients. This should help us to select the best alternative for each of them

Lens-based surgical correction of presbyopia. Where are we in 2020? / Corrección de la presbicia tras cirugía cristaliniana. ¿Dónde nos encontramos en 2020?

INTRODUCTION: Presbyopia is the progressive and irreversible loss of accommodation due to aging. It is one of the main causes of loss of quality of life in people from 45 years of age, due to the, often novel, dependence on spectacles. The eagerness to correct it by ophthalmologists impulsed by the desire of millions of people who suffer from it, has become one of the main drivers for the development of intraocular lens (IOL) technology over the last twenty years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review briefly presents the different alternatives that have allowed us to improve the crystalline lens surgical approach of presbyopia; from monofocal lenses and monovision technique, accommodative, refractive, and diffractive multifocal lenses, and finally the most recent extended depth of focus/field lenses known as EDOFs. RESULTS: Each IOL has its advantages, limitations and disadvantages. Furthermore, there is no single lens that suits the needs of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to know the variety of lenses available, and to have an in-depth understanding of their optical properties, as well as the impact that these will have later on their clinical performance and on the visual quality of the patients. This should help us to select the best alternative for each of them.

Resultados visuales, independencia de gafas e insatisfacción tras implante de una lente intraocular difractiva trifocal / Visual outcomes, spectacle independence and satisfaction after diffractive trifocal intraocular lens implantation

OBJETIVO: Evaluar los resultados visuales, la independencia de gafas y la satisfacción tras el implante de una lente intraocular trifocal. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de 5.186 sujetos intervenidos de facoemulsificación con implante de la lente trifocal difractiva FineVision Micro F12 (PhysIOL, Liège, Bélgica). RESULTADOS: La queratometría media preoperatoria fue 43,61±1,55 D y el cilindro queratométrico medio -0,86 ± 0,66 D. A los 3 meses, cambiaron a 43,59±1,56 y −0,71±0,46 D respectivamente. La esfera media pasó de 2,04±2,60 a 0,14±0,38 D y el equivalente esférico medio de 1,64±2,61 a −0,05±0,36 D. Más del 60% alcanzaron una mejor agudeza visual corregida de lejos. La mayoría presentó un defecto residual final (predictibilidad) menor de 1 D (99,1%). El 14,3% precisó un ajuste refractivo, el 2,2% capsulotomía posterior y se recolocó la lente intraocular en 5 casos. Un porcentaje elevado estaba satisfecho en términos de visión e independencia de gafas en todas las distancias. Aunque un 2% refirió un empeoramiento en la visión nocturna, únicamente un 2% estaba poco satisfecho y 20 pacientes insatisfechos. Las causas fueron: visión borrosa (7 casos), necesidad de gafas (10), disfotopsias (7) y sequedad ocular (4). CONCLUSIONES: La implantación de esta lente permite obtener buenos resultados visuales en las 3 distancias así como un alto grado de independencia de gafas y de satisfacción

PURPOSE: To investigate visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction after trifocal intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: A retrospective study conducted on 5,186 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and were implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (FineVision Micro F, PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium). RESULTS: The mean pre-operative keratometry was 43.61±1.55 D, and mean keratometric cylinder was -0.86±0.66 D. At 3 months post-operatively, values changed to 43.59±1.56 and -0.71±0.46 D, respectively. Mean sphere varied from 2.04±2.60 to 0.14±0.38 D, and mean spherical equivalent from 1.64±2.61 to -0.05±0.36 D. More than 60% of the patients achieved better corrected distance visual acuity. The majority had a final residual refractive error (predictability) lower than 1 D (99.1%), with 14.3% needing optical adjustment (bioptics). Posterior capsulotomy was performed in 2.2%, and the lens was replaced in 5 patients. A high percentage of patients were satisfied in terms of vision and spectacle independence at all distances. Although 2% referred to worsening of night vision quality, only 2% were not very satisfied and 20 patients were dissatisfied. The causes were: blurred vision (7 cases), spectacle dependence (10), dysphotopsia (7), and dry eye (4). CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of this model provided good visual performance in all distances, as well as high levels of spectacle independence and satisfaction

Visual outcomes, spectacle independence and satisfaction after diffractive trifocal intraocular lens implantation. / Resultados visuales, independencia de gafas e insatisfacción tras implante de una lente intraocular difractiva trifocal.

PURPOSE: To investigate visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction after trifocal intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: A retrospective study conducted on 5,186 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and were implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (FineVision Micro F, PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium). RESULTS: The mean pre-operative keratometry was 43.61±1.55 D, and mean keratometric cylinder was -0.86±0.66 D. At 3 months post-operatively, values changed to 43.59±1.56 and -0.71±0.46 D, respectively. Mean sphere varied from 2.04±2.60 to 0.14±0.38 D, and mean spherical equivalent from 1.64±2.61 to -0.05±0.36 D. More than 60% of the patients achieved better corrected distance visual acuity. The majority had a final residual refractive error (predictability) lower than 1 D (99.1%), with 14.3% needing optical adjustment (bioptics). Posterior capsulotomy was performed in 2.2%, and the lens was replaced in 5 patients. A high percentage of patients were satisfied in terms of vision and spectacle independence at all distances. Although 2% referred to worsening of night vision quality, only 2% were not very satisfied and 20 patients were dissatisfied. The causes were: blurred vision (7 cases), spectacle dependence (10), dysphotopsia (7), and dry eye (4). CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of this model provided good visual performance in all distances, as well as high levels of spectacle independence and satisfaction.

Comparación de 5.468 retratamientos tras láser in situ queratomileusis levantando el lentículo o mediante queratectomía fotorrefractiva sobre el lentículo / Comparison of 5468 retreatments after laser in situ keratomileusis by lifting the flap or performing photorefractive keratectomy on the flap

Objetivo: Describir los resultados visuales del retratamiento tras láser in situ queratomileusis (LASIK) levantando el lentículo previamente o realizando queratectomía fotorrefractiva (PRK) sobre él, establecer si el riesgo de crecimiento epitelial de la interfase (CEI) es mayor cuanto más tiempo ha pasado entre el LASIK inicial y el retratamiento por levantamiento y determinar la incidencia de la opacidad corneal (haze) tras PRK. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de 4.077 pacientes (5.468 ojos) tratados mediante LASIK y retratamiento para estudiar los resultados visuales e identificar los casos de CEI y haze corneal. Resultados: Se estudiaron 5.196 ojos de 3.876 pacientes retratados de miopía levantando el lentículo y 272 ojos de 201 pacientes retratados mediante PRK en el lentículo. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los retratamientos en predictibilidad, eficacia y seguridad. Se encontró un total de 704 casos de CEI tras levantar el lentículo; se necesitó limpieza quirúrgica en 70. La limpieza quirúrgica disminuyó el índice de eficacia al compararlo con el de los pacientes con CEI que no precisaron limpieza (p = 0,01). Las diferencias en términos de seguridad y predictibilidad no fueron estadísticamente significativas. La incidencia de haze corneal tras la ablación de superficie sobre el lentículo previo fue del 14,34%, aunque ninguno de estos casos fue clínicamente relevante. Conclusiones: Los resultados visuales son similares entre los pacientes retratados mediante levantamiento del lentículo o mediante PRK. La incidencia de CEI levantando lentículo fue del 13,55%. La incidencia de CEI aumenta a medida que aumenta el tiempo entre el procedimiento primario y el retratamiento (AU)

Purpose: To assess visual outcomes of retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by lifting the flap or performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on the flap, as well as to establish whether there was an increased risk of epithelial ingrowth (EIG) when LASIK and lifting of the flap are separated by a long time interval and to determine the incidence of corneal haze after PRK. Methods: Retrospective study of 4077 patients (5468 eyes) who underwent LASIK and subsequent retreatment were reviewed in order to study their visual results and identify cases of EIG and corneal haze. Results: Enhancements included 5196 eyes from 3876 patients that were retreated by lifting the flap, and 272 eyes from 201 patients that were retreated by PRK on the flap. No statistically significant differences were found between the retreatments in terms of predictability, efficacy, and safety. A total of 704 cases of EIG were found after lifting the flap, for which surgical cleansing was necessary in 70. Surgical cleansing decreased the efficacy index when compared with patients with EIG who did not need cleansing (P = .01). Differences in terms of safety and predictability were not statistically significant. The incidence of corneal haze after ablation of the surface of the previous flap was 14.34%, although none of these cases were clinically relevant. Conclusions: Visual outcomes were similar between patients who were retreated by lifting the flap and those who underwent PRK. The incidence of EIG when the flap was lifted was 13.55%. The incidence of EIG increases with the time elapsed between the primary procedure and retreatment (AU)

Comparison of 5468 retreatments after laser in situ keratomileusis by lifting the flap or performing photorefractive keratectomy on the flap. / Comparación de 5.468 retratamientos tras láser in situ queratomileusis levantando el lentículo o mediante queratectomía fotorrefractiva sobre el lentículo.

PURPOSE: To assess visual outcomes of retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by lifting the flap or performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on the flap, as well as to establish whether there was an increased risk of epithelial ingrowth (EIG) when LASIK and lifting of the flap are separated by a long time interval and to determine the incidence of corneal haze after PRK. METHODS: Retrospective study of 4077 patients (5468 eyes) who underwent LASIK and subsequent retreatment were reviewed in order to study their visual results and identify cases of EIG and corneal haze. RESULTS: Enhancements included 5196 eyes from 3876 patients that were retreated by lifting the flap, and 272 eyes from 201 patients that were retreated by PRK on the flap. No statistically significant differences were found between the retreatments in terms of predictability, efficacy, and safety. A total of 704 cases of EIG were found after lifting the flap, for which surgical cleansing was necessary in 70. Surgical cleansing decreased the efficacy index when compared with patients with EIG who did not need cleansing (P=.01). Differences in terms of safety and predictability were not statistically significant. The incidence of corneal haze after ablation of the surface of the previous flap was 14.34%, although none of these cases were clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes were similar between patients who were retreated by lifting the flap and those who underwent PRK. The incidence of EIG when the flap was lifted was 13.55%. The incidence of EIG increases with the time elapsed between the primary procedure and retreatment.

Implantación de lente fáquica para corrección de miopía en pacientes con leucoma corneal / Implantable collamer lens for correction of ametropia in eyes with corneal scarring

CASOS: Comunicamos 2 casos en los que la implantación de una lente fáquica corrige defectos refractivos en ojos con leucoma. Ambos sufrieron un accidente hace años, quedando un leucoma lineal central en uno de sus ojos. El primero presentaba la lesión en su ojo izquierdo. Su agudeza visual corregida de lejos fue de 0,3 (−7,75; −4×160°). Tras implantar la lente fáquica alcanzó una agudeza visual no corregida de lejos de 0,3. El segundo mostraba en su ojo derecho una lesión oblicua con agudeza visual corregida de 0,25 (−8,75; −1,25×8°). Tras la intervención alcanzó una agudeza visual no corregida de 0,25. Discusión: Las indicaciones de la implantación de una lente fáquica son susceptibles de ser revisadas y, posiblemente, ampliadas

CASES: Two cases are reported in which implantation of a collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens (implantable collamer lens) corrected refractive errors in eyes with corneal scarring. A previous accident, in both cases, resulted in a central linear scar on the surface of the cornea of one eye. In the first patient, a corneal scar was visible in the left eye. The distance corrected visual acuity was 0.3 (-7.75 -4×160°). An uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.25 was obtained by implanting an implantable collamer lens. In the second patient an oblique corneal scar was visible in the right eye. The distance corrected visual acuity was 0.25 (-8.75 -1.25×8°), and after implantation of the implantable collamer lens, uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.25. Discussion: The indications of the implantable collamer lens should be reviewed and possibly expanded

Implantable collamer lens for correction of ametropia in eyes with corneal scarring. / Implantación de lente fáquica para corrección de miopía en pacientes con leucoma corneal.

CASES: Two cases are reported in which implantation of a collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens (implantable collamer lens) corrected refractive errors in eyes with corneal scarring. A previous accident, in both cases, resulted in a central linear scar on the surface of the cornea of one eye. In the first patient, a corneal scar was visible in the left eye. The distance corrected visual acuity was 0.3 (-7.75 -4×160°). An uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.25 was obtained by implanting an implantable collamer lens. In the second patient an oblique corneal scar was visible in the right eye. The distance corrected visual acuity was 0.25 (-8.75 -1.25×8°), and after implantation of the implantable collamer lens, uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.25. DISCUSSION: The indications of the implantable collamer lens should be reviewed and possibly expanded.

LASIK y ablación de superficie en pacientes tratados con amiodarona / LASIK and surface ablation in patients treated with amiodarone

OBJETIVO: Determinar los resultados anatómicos y funcionales de los pacientes intervenidos con cirugía refractiva corneal que estaban en tratamiento con amiodarona, la cual ha sido considerada como una posible contraindicación en estas intervenciones. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se ha realizado un estudio observacional retrospectivo. Los pacientes se incluyeron consecutivamente. Se incluyó a todos los pacientes que tomaban amiodarona y fueron operados mediante LASIK o ablación de superficie entre enero de 2003 y diciembre de 2014. Se pretenden describir los resultados funcionales (visuales y refractivos). RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a un total de 20 pacientes (33 ojos). No se encontraron complicaciones intraoperatorias o postoperatorias significativas. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra experiencia los pacientes tratados con amiodarona e intervenidos mediante LASIK o ablación de superficie no presentaron complicaciones clínicas significativas. La contraindicación absoluta por tomar determinadas medicaciones sistémicas debería ser reconsiderada

OBJECTIVE: To determine the anatomical and functional outcomes of corneal refractive surgery in patients on amiodarone, a drug listed as being contraindicated in patients undergoing this procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on all consecutive patients who took amiodarone and who underwent LASIK or surface ablation from January 2003 to December 2014. Functional (visual and refractive) outcomes are described. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (33 eyes) were included. No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, LASIK and surface ablation did not produce significant clinical complications in selected patients taking amiodarone. The absolute exclusion of certain systemic medications should be reconsidered

LASIK and surface ablation in patients treated with amiodarone. / LASIK y ablación de superficie en pacientes tratados con amiodarona.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the anatomical and functional outcomes of corneal refractive surgery in patients on amiodarone, a drug listed as being contraindicated in patients undergoing this procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on all consecutive patients who took amiodarone and who underwent LASIK or surface ablation from January 2003 to December 2014. Functional (visual and refractive) outcomes are described. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (33 eyes) were included. No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, LASIK and surface ablation did not produce significant clinical complications in selected patients taking amiodarone. The absolute exclusion of certain systemic medications should be reconsidered.

Ectasia corneal post-LASIK en pacientes con diferencias significativas en las lecturas queratométricas de ambos ojos / Post-lasik corneal ectasia in patients with significant differences in keratometry readings between both eyes

OBJETIVOS: Investigar la incidencia de ectasia corneal tras queratomileusis in situ asistida por láser excímer (LASIK) en pacientes con diferencias significativas en la lectura queratométrica media (KM) entre ambos ojos (AO). Además se evalúan los resultados visuales. MÉTODOS: Se han revisado las historias clínicas de 164.603 pacientes (315.259 ojos) intervenidos con LASIK de enero de 2003 a diciembre de 2011 para identificar pacientes con una diferencia de KM ≥ 1,25 D entre AO. Además de este criterio, debían ser pacientes miopes con topografía corneal normal. Las principales variables de estudio fueron la incidencia de ectasia tras LASIK y el resultado visual. RESULTADOS: Un total de 35 ojos de 20 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Los resultados funcionales y visuales fueron los esperados para las refracciones estudiadas. No se encontraron ectasias en la serie estudiada tras un seguimiento mínimo de 2 años. CONCLUSIONES: La posibilidad de encontrar en un paciente asimetría de KM y topografía normal es pequeña (0,021%) y no parece ser una contraindicación para realizar LASIK. A pesar de no encontrarse ectasias en la serie estudiada, ya que esta es una complicación potencialmente grave para la visión, los pacientes con elevadas diferencias en la KM entre AO deben ser estudiados cuidadosamente antes de ser intervenidos mediante LASIK

OBJECTIVES: A study is made on the incidence of corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with large differences in mean keratometry (MK) readings between both eyes (OU). Visual outcomes were also evaluated. METHODS: The medical records of 164,603 patients (315,259 eyes) who underwent LASIK from January 2003 to December 2011 were reviewed in order to identify patients with a difference in MK of ≥ 1.25 D between OU. The main outcome measures were incidence of ectasia after LASIK, and visual outcome. RESULTS: A total of 35 eyes that met the inclusion criteria were found. Functional and visual results were those expected for myopia studies. After a minimum follow-up of 2 years, no corneal ectasia was found in 3 eyes (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of finding a patient with an asymmetry in MK and normal topography is low (0.021%), and it does not seem to be a contraindication of LASIK. Although no corneal ectasia was found in this case series, and as it is a potentially sight-threatening complication, patients with very different MK between OU should be studied carefully before undergoing LASIK

[Post-lasik corneal ectasia in patients with significant differences in keratometry readings between both eyes]. / Ectasia corneal post-LASIK en pacientes con diferencias significativas en las lecturas queratométricas de ambos ojos.

OBJECTIVES: A study is made on the incidence of corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with large differences in mean keratometry (MK) readings between both eyes (OU). Visual outcomes were also evaluated. METHODS: The medical records of 164,603 patients (315,259 eyes) who underwent LASIK from January 2003 to December 2011 were reviewed in order to identify patients with a difference in MK of ≥ 1.25 D between OU. The main outcome measures were incidence of ectasia after LASIK, and visual outcome. RESULTS: A total of 35 eyes that met the inclusion criteria were found. Functional and visual results were those expected for myopia studies. After a minimum follow-up of 2 years, no corneal ectasia was found in 3 eyes (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of finding a patient with an asymmetry in MK and normal topography is low (0.021%), and it does not seem to be a contraindication of LASIK. Although no corneal ectasia was found in this case series, and as it is a potentially sight-threatening complication, patients with very different MK between OU should be studied carefully before undergoing LASIK.

Queratitis infecciosas en 262.191 láser in situ keratomileusis / Infectious queratitis in 266.191 laser in situ queratomileusis

ObjetivoEstudiar la incidencia de queratitis infecciosas (QI) tras láser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), el diagnóstico, la actitud terapéutica adoptada, el manejo y los resultados.Material y métodoHemos realizado un estudio retrospectivo, entre los 262.191 ojos intervenidos consecutivamente con LASIK, en nuestros 20 centros, durante el periodo comprendido entre septiembre de 2002 y diciembre de 2009, de todos aquellos casos susceptibles de ser diagnosticados como QI, tanto por la clínica, como por los hallazgos biológicos.ResultadoHan sido recogidos un total de 82 casos de queratitis infecciosas, lo que supone una incidencia del 0,031%.Se presenta la distribución por sexo, la edad media de los pacientes, la media de días transcurridos desde la cirugía, el cuadro clínico, los factores predisponentes, la actitud terapéutica, las complicaciones, la filiación del germen causal, y la pérdida de líneas de visión.ConclusionesLa queratitis infecciosa tras LASIK es una complicación poco frecuente. El diagnóstico temprano y el manejo del proceso son determinantes a la hora de establecer un pronóstico. En nuestra casuística todos los casos se resolvieron sin causar otras complicaciones de gravedad(AU)

ObjectiveTo study the incidence of infectious keratitis (IK) after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), along with its diagnosis, therapeutic action taken, its management and the results.Material and methodWe carried out a retrospective study of 262,191 eyes intervened consecutively with LASIK, in our 20 centres, during the period from September 2002 and December 2009. All the cases susceptible to being diagnosed with IK, either clinically or due to the biological findings were analysed.ResultsA total of 82 cases were found with infectious keratitis, which assumed an incidence of 0.031%.Distributions are presented by gender, mean age of the patients, mean days since the surgery, the clinical signs and symptoms, predisposing factors, therapeutic action, complications, details of the causal germ, and the loss of lines of vision.ConclusionsInfectious keratitis after LASIK is a rare complication. The early diagnosis and management of the process are determining factors when establishing the prognosis. In our series all the cases were resolved without causing any other serious complications(AU)

[Infectious keratitis in 266,191 laser in situ keratomileusis]. / Queratitis infecciosas en 262.191 láser in situ keratomileusis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of infectious keratitis (IK) after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), along with its diagnosis, therapeutic action taken, its management and the results. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We carried out a retrospective study of 262,191 eyes intervened consecutively with LASIK, in our 20 centres, during the period from September 2002 and December 2009. All the cases susceptible to being diagnosed with IK, either clinically or due to the biological findings were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 82 cases were found with infectious keratitis, which assumed an incidence of 0.031%. Distributions are presented by gender, mean age of the patients, mean days since the surgery, the clinical signs and symptoms, predisposing factors, therapeutic action, complications, details of the causal germ, and the loss of lines of vision. CONCLUSIONS: Infectious keratitis after LASIK is a rare complication. The early diagnosis and management of the process are determining factors when establishing the prognosis. In our series all the cases were resolved without causing any other serious complications.

[Anatomical repercussion on the zonular apparatus after a capsular tension ring insertion in swine eyes]. / Estudio experimental sobre la repercusión anatómica de la zónula de Zinn tras la introducción de un anillo endocapsular en ojos de cerdo.

PURPOSE: To carry out an experimental and descriptive study that exhibits the anatomical repercussions on the zonular apparatus after a capsular tension ring (CTR) is inserted. METHODS: CTRs were inserted in five swine eyes (four with forceps, one with an injector). Two additional eyes were left untouched for control purposes. The integrity of the suspensory ligament was examined by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: We did not observe alterations in the integrity of the zonular apparatus. The suspensory ligaments adopted a new fold configuration. CONCLUSIONS: CTR insertion is a safe therapeutic tool to maintain the integrity of the lens zonules in elastic, large diameter capsular bags.

Estudio experimental sobre la repercusión anatómica de la zónula de Zinn tras la introducción de un anillo endocapsular en ojos de cerdo / Anatomical repercusion on the zonular apparatus after a capsular tension ring insertion in swine eyes

Objetivos: Valorar experimentalmente la integridad morfológica de los ligamentos suspensorios de la zónula de Zinn (LSZZ) tras la introducción de un anillo de distensión capsular (ADC) mediante un estudio descriptivo. Métodos: Se utilizaron siete ojos de cerdo a los cuales se realizó una extracción extracapsular de cristalino transparente. A cuatro se introdujo un ADC con pinzas y al quinto con inyector. Los otros dos se utilizaron como control. Se examinó la integridad anatómica y la nueva configuración de los LSZZ con un microscopio electrónico de barrido. Resultados: No se observaron alteraciones en la integridad de los LSZZ. Los LSZZ adoptan tras la introducción de un ADC una nueva trayectoria de repliegue consecuencia de la nueva disposición del saco capsular. Conclusiones: En un modelo experimental conojos de cerdo no se encontraron lesiones en los LSZZ por lo que parece que, en cápsulas elásticas y de gran diámetro, la inserción de un ADC no produce roturas en los LSZZ

Purpose: To carry out an experimental and descriptive study that exhibits the anatomical repercussions on the zonular apparatus after a capsular tensionring (CTR) is inserted. Methods: CTRs were inserted in five swine eyes (four with forceps, one with an injector). Two additional eyes were left untouched for control purposes.The integrity of the suspensory ligament was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Results: We did not observe alterations in the integrity of the zonular apparatus. The suspensory ligaments adopted a new fold configuration. Conclusions: CTR insertion is a safe therapeutic tool to maintain the integrity of the lens zonules inelastic, large diameter capsular bags